Vieren — Articles

The Degeneracy Economy

2026-05-23T00:00:00Z

Yesterday, over a hundred people paid $199 to join a program that kicks them out if they don't launch a working product in 30 days. The money is gone the second you sign up. No refund policy.

You ship or you get thrown overboard and publicly shamed in front of the entire community.

The program is called Ship or Die. Two indie hackers, Marc Lou and Jack Friks , launched it less than 24 hours ago. As of right now, 134 people have paid. That's over $25,000 collected in a single day for an accountability product with zero curriculum and barely any content. Just a deadline and the threat of humiliation.

That should tell you everything about where we're headed.

A 22-year-old in Los Angeles bet his rent on whether Trump would tweet before 9am. He won. He paid rent. He did it again the next month. Polymarket did $9 billion in volume last year. Normal people with iPhones placing bets on elections, Fed rate decisions, whether a CEO gets fired.

Tuyo lets you buy now and pay maybe. You make payments when you feel like it, whenever you feel like it, with zero consequences if you don't. Just vibes and a prayer from the lender. How much financial nihilism do you want to put into consumer credit? Yes.

How did we get here

The boomers bought every house in the neighborhood, then voted to make sure nobody builds new ones. The average home costs 7x median income. Student debt crossed $1.7 trillion. Entry-level jobs require 3 years of experience while paying $42k in cities where a studio apartment costs $2,200 a month.

Gen Z did the math. The math ain't mathing.

When the traditional path to stability requires a decade of grinding just to reach the starting line your parents stood on at 23, gambling starts looking rational. The odds on the straight path are just as bad.

A 25-year-old saving $500 a month at 7% annual returns will have a house deposit in 14 years. She'll be 39. Her parents bought their first house at 26 with a single income and a handshake.

So she puts $200 on Polymarket instead. At least it's exciting. At least the outcome comes in 48 hours instead of 14 years. Sometimes when you FA it isn't till later the FO part of life hits you. But when the FO is already baked into the system, what's the difference.

Degeneracy as a business model

Every new fintech pitch deck has the same insight buried in slide 7: young people will accept worse terms if you make it feel like a game.

Gambling apps already figured this out. Sportsbooks spent $1.8 billion on advertising last year. DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM. They sell belonging. Watch the game with your boys. Put some skin in it. Make it mean something. The gambling part is just the delivery mechanism.

Now that playbook is bleeding into every vertical. Fitness. Civic engagement. Financial flexibility. Productivity. Every single one wraps a bet inside something that sounds responsible.

Strip the branding and it's all the same dopamine loop with a different skin.

The moral math

Boomers hoarded the assets. Pulled the ladder up. Now they call Gen Z lazy for not climbing something that was removed before they got to it.

Gen Z looked at the game, saw it was rigged, decided to play a different one. One where the house still wins but at least the results come fast and the interface has confetti animations.

The generation that inflated housing beyond reach and defunded every institution that used to create middle-class stability has no standing to lecture about financial responsibility. You folded an entire generation like cheap napkins and now you're surprised they came back feral.

Where this goes

We're early. Gambling will keep showing up in places you don't expect. Give it two years and someone will build a dating app where you stake money on getting a second date.

Every vertical that can add variable reward plus risk plus a leaderboard will. The engagement numbers are too good to pass up. The generation with all the screen time has been trained on dopamine loops since they were toddlers. Zero quit in their veins. Zero impulse control in their feed.

The degenerate economy is the logical conclusion of closing every normal door and leaving the casino open 24/7.

But the casino works both ways

The same loss aversion that makes people blow their paycheck on Polymarket is the same loss aversion that made 134 people pay $199 to ship a product.

The psychology is identical. The direction is different.

Steppa takes your gambling brain and points it at your health. You're not betting on sports. You're betting that you'll get off the couch. And 70% of the time, you win, because most people are too lazy to show up.

Ship or Die takes your gambling brain and points it at your output. You're not betting on an election. You're betting that you can build something real in 30 days. And you're doing it inside a community of 134 people who are all building at the same time. The deadline gets you moving. The people around you keep you honest. Miss it and you lose your money. Hit it and you walk out with something real that wouldn't have existed without the pressure.

The mechanism is cooked. But the result is you walking more, building more, shipping more. The degenerate economy is ugly. No question. But the people who understand the psychology and point it at themselves instead of a slot machine are going to come out of this decade in a very different position than the people who let it point at them.

I joined Ship or Die yesterday. I'm also starting a step challenge on Steppa this Monday.

Daily reminder you should bet on yourself.

Your Brain Is Training Itself to Avoid Hard Things

2026-05-15T00:00:00Z

You sat down to do the thing. Record the video. Write the sales page. Send the pitch. And immediately your body said no. Something in your chest tightened and you picked up your phone instead.

That feeling has a name. And a mechanism. And it gets worse every time you listen to it.

The avoidance loop

Tim Pychyl spent twenty years studying procrastination at Carleton University. His conclusion: procrastination is an emotion regulation problem. It has zero to do with time management or laziness.

When you think about doing something difficult, your brain generates a negative emotion. Self-doubt. Overwhelm. Fear that the result won't be good enough. Your amygdala flags the task as a threat. Same alarm system that would fire if someone broke into your house. Except the threat is a Google Doc.

So you escape. You clean something. Reorganize your Notion. Make a coffee. Open Instagram.

And the dread fades. You feel relief.

That relief is the trap. In psychology, behaviors that get rewarded get repeated. Your brain just learned that avoiding hard things produces a positive feeling. So next time you face something difficult, it defaults to the same move. Avoid. Relief. Repeat.

Every time you go through this cycle, you physically strengthen the neural pathway for avoidance. Like a trail in the woods that gets wider every time you walk it. Meanwhile the trail where you actually do the hard thing grows over.

Pychyl calls this the avoidance loop. Difficult task triggers negative emotion. You avoid the task. You feel relief. Next difficult task, same thing. The loop gets faster and more automatic each time.

The dopamine side

Andrew Huberman explained a related piece from the dopamine side. Your baseline level of dopamine determines your baseline motivation. When dopamine is low, everything feels like effort. When it sits at a healthy level, you can push through friction.

The problem: every time you escape into your phone or a distraction, you get a small dopamine hit from the easy thing. That momentarily spikes your dopamine, then drops it below where it was before. So you end up less motivated than when you started. The avoidance felt good for a minute, then made starting even harder.

This is why you can procrastinate for three hours and feel more exhausted than if you'd just done the work.

The two disguises

Your brain won't just let you sit on the couch. Sitting there doing nothing triggers guilt. Guilt is another negative emotion. Your amygdala wants to escape that too.

So it disguises the avoidance as productivity.

Perfectionism is the first disguise. Research shows that people who score higher on perfectionism are bigger procrastinators. The fear that the result won't meet the standard keeps you from starting at all. Pychyl's data showed that more perfectionist professors actually published fewer papers than their less perfectionist colleagues, even when controlling for work ethic. The standard became the excuse.

Productive procrastination is the second disguise. You spend the morning reorganizing your content calendar. You research microphones for two hours. You read a book about launching instead of writing the sales page. Your to-do list fills up with checkmarks. But the one thing that actually matters hasn't moved.

Pychyl calls this short-term mood repair. When a real task triggers anxiety, your brain swaps it for a safer task that still gives you a sense of accomplishment but carries zero risk of failure.

I wrote about how all of this shows up specifically in entrepreneurship here: If You Think Ayahuasca Brings Up Your Shadows, Try Entrepreneurship. Every shadow that surfaces when you try to build something with your name on it, fear of being seen, rejection, imposter syndrome, scarcity, all of them trigger this same avoidance loop. Entrepreneurship is a slow-drip version of facing your demons. On a random Tuesday afternoon when you're just trying to record a talking head reel.

What actually works

Pychyl's answer after twenty years of research is almost embarrassingly simple.

Just start. For ten minutes. Don't think about finishing. Don't think about the outcome. Just open the thing and work for ten minutes.

He ran a study where he gave 45 students pagers and paged them eight times a day for five days leading up to a deadline. Students consistently procrastinated on tasks they found difficult and replaced them with easier activities. They justified it all week. "I work better under pressure." "I'll feel more like it tomorrow."

When the deadline forced them to start, every single one said they wished they'd started earlier. The task was never as bad as they'd imagined.

Your brain's prediction about how bad something will feel is wrong almost every time. The dread of starting is almost always bigger than the thing itself.

Two specific moves that interrupt the loop:

First, name the emotion out loud. "I'm scared this won't be good enough." "I'm overwhelmed and don't know where to start." UCLA researchers found that labeling an emotion calms the amygdala. Shifts you from reacting to thinking. Simple, and it works fast.

Second, shrink the task until it's stupid. Don't tell yourself you need to write a 3,000 word article. Tell yourself to open the doc and write three sentences. Don't tell yourself you need to record a video. Tell yourself to set up the tripod and press record for ten minutes.

The compounding problem

Every time you go through the avoidance loop, the procrastination pathway in your brain gets stronger and the action pathway gets weaker. Like a muscle you stopped training.

But it compounds the other direction too. Every time you push through the first ten minutes, the avoidance circuit weakens and the action circuit strengthens. The friction gets smaller each time.

The founders who ship, who post, who launch, who put their face out there. They still feel the dread. They just got better at starting anyway.

Start before you feel ready. You'll never feel ready. Do it anyway.

Distribution Ate Everything

2026-04-28T00:00:00Z

OpenAI paid hundreds of millions of dollars for TBPN. A podcast. Two guys talking into microphones.

The most advanced AI lab on the planet paid more for a podcast than 99% of venture-backed startups will ever exit for.

a16z is building media arms. Paramount grabbed The Free Press for $150M. Stripe swallowed Indie Hackers. HubSpot bought The Hustle. Semafor raised $30M at a $330M valuation. Fox took Red Seat Ventures.

The smartest money on earth is making the same bet. And it's not on products.

It's on eyeballs.

A 14-year-old with Claude can ship an app in a weekend. Multiply that by a few million kids with laptops and wifi. They can build infinite apps, infinite content, infinite AI agents flooding every platform nonstop.

You can't print new eyeballs. There are 8 billion humans and 24 hours in a day. That's it. That's the global supply of attention. Production costs are collapsing to zero but CPMs keep climbing.

This is the distribution supercycle.

The old playbook is cooked

Meta CPMs crossed $40 in most B2C niches. Customer acquisition cost is up 222%. The average app converts at 1.2% on paid traffic. For every 1,000 people you pay to click, 988 ghost you.

Zuckerberg's new pitch is "give us your URL and we'll do the rest." When Meta's AI decides who sees your ads, creative quality and your willingness to stomach higher CPMs are all you have left. Their own data showed cost per conversion dropped 22.6% when they removed manual targeting. Good for their algorithm. Terrible for founders who relied on targeting precision to compete with bigger budgets.

When ads run through the same AI, the company that can pay the most per impression wins. Startups are not great at budget wars.

Billboards, TV, radio, print. Priced in 1998 dollars, performing to 1998 attention spans, still charging 2026 rates. The people still buying them confuse visibility with distribution.

Traditional influencers. $4,000 for a video averaging 3,000 views. Flat rate for a coin flip. Every one of these channels charges you the same whether the campaign prints money or dies in silence.

What actually works

Organic distribution. There are only four ways to play:

Algorithmic text (X, Threads, LinkedIn, IG carousels)
Algorithmic short-form video (Reels, TikTok, Shorts, Facebook Reels, LinkedIn video)
Algorithmic long-form video (YouTube)
Long-form video intentionally made to be clipped into short-form

That's it. If you don't have someone in your org who has genuinely figured out one of these four routes, you will get outrun by someone who has.

Kevin O'Leary used to pay customer acquisition managers $48,000. He now pays them $250,000. Because you can measure their output by revenue generated per week. Some of them go contractor and clear half a million a year. They know how to take content, cut it into a 59-second ad, and acquire 200 customers. Those people, usually in their early twenties, are the most valuable hires in business right now.

Clips are the new Facebook ads

Content distribution runs on clips now. Podcasts are clip factories. The average successful show produces 30 to 50 clips per episode and those clips reach 20x to 50x the audience of the full episode. Most fans consume the clips, not the show. The show is raw material. Clips are the distribution.

Both presidential campaigns in 2024 hired dedicated social clipping teams. The Harris campaign streamlined content approvals so clips of debate moments and rally reactions hit TikTok, Shorts, and Reels within minutes. 60-second clips reached more voters than any TV ad buy in history. Short-form distribution became an electoral strategy for the presidency of the United States.

The window

This is still early. UGC distribution and clip engines are where Facebook ads were in 2008. The founders who figure this out now will own their distribution for the next decade. The ones who keep renting attention from ad platforms will spend more every quarter for less.

The product is easy to copy. Distribution is the thing that compounds.